Why a separate category for Romania when Matchquote is a European studio?+
Because Romania moved quickly on tax digitization over the past two years — e-Factura, SAF-T, e-Transport, REGES — and the incumbent invoicing platforms (SmartBill, Oblio, SAGA) haven't yet extended into the after-layer: triage, debug, drafted replies, cross-reconciliation. That opens a focused regulatory category that doesn't currently exist in the same shape elsewhere in the EU.
How is this different from the Document AI vertical?+
Document AI parses structured documents into your ERP — it sits before the tax authority. Regulatory AI sits after: it reads what ANAF sends back, explains what broke, drafts the reply, and tracks deadlines. Different audience (accounting firms, not finance ops), different liability posture (professional responsibility vs operational automation), different pricing vocabulary (RON/month, not EUR setup).
Which products are live today, and which are on the roadmap?+
SPV Copilot is the shipped flagship — live, documented, priced. DAC7 Pensiune Copilot and e-Transport Monitor are on the roadmap for firms on the waitlist; we scope and build them on demand once SPV Copilot has reached a stable revenue base. The category thesis is real; the two adjacent products are sequenced, not simultaneous.
Who is liable when the AI is wrong?+
The licensed professional — accountant, transport operator, host — always. Every output is labeled human-in-the-loop. No message is submitted to ANAF, no UIT code is filed, no DAC7 report is signed without explicit human approval. We carry our part via a Processor DPA (GDPR art. 28) that clarifies roles. ANAF's own position (Albert Fruth, 2024) confirms the accountant carries submission liability.